Skip to main content Skip to secondary navigation

The Natural Capital Symposium is back! Registration is now open.

Learn more
Main content start

Research Highlights Connection Between Hydropower Sustainability And Watershed Conservation In Northern India

Natcap’s Rios software being used to target conservation investments in Himalayan region
Forests in Himachal Pradesh become degraded over time as trees are continuously cut for timber and firewood. Payments to communities to plant trees can provide income and offset damages to the province’s natural capital. Credit: Jussi-Paavo R L Piekkala / Flickr
Forests in Himachal Pradesh become degraded over time as trees are continuously cut for timber and firewood. Payments to communities to plant trees can provide income and offset damages to the province’s natural capital. Credit: Jussi-Paavo R L Piekkala / Flickr

Himachal Pradesh is a province in the mountainous Himalayan region in northern India. Its numerous rivers make it a major source for hydropower in a rapidly growing region—a boon to the state’s economy. But the region’s many steep canyons and gorges also create challenges for building typical hydropower reservoirs.

Unlike in flatter areas, where reservoirs can store water behind a dam and release it at a controlled rate to provide a steady power source, in dramatic landscapes like the Himalayas, there’s nowhere to build a reservoir.

Instead, engineers rely upon what’s called a run-of-river system, where water is diverted from a river into a power plant, and then channeled back into the river. Run-of-river systems are also cheaper and easier to build than traditional large dams. The downside to this system is that it’s vulnerable to high sediment concentrations, since there’s no reservoir for sediment to settle into. Another drawback is that when a river stops flowing, so does the power.

Yet another downside is that during flash floods, the power facilities have to shut down to avoid being damaged. There’s nowhere to store the water and no way to capture energy, so it flows away, untapped.

Problems with sediment and flow can be partially mitigated by investing in watershed conservation activities upstream, a new study shows.

 

The research, published last month in Environmental Science & Policy, shows that sediment flowing into rivers that feed hydropower projects could be cut roughly in half (44%), by paying people upstream to perform specific conservation activities in targeted areas. The paper details the team’s use of NatCap’s InVEST and RIOS software to model ecosystem services within five watersheds in Himachal Pradesh.

This mountainous region of northern India already has many hydropower projects, and is slated to receive many more. Credit: Henrik Johansson / Flickr
This mountainous region of northern India already has many hydropower projects, and is slated to receive many more. Credit: Henrik Johansson / Flickr

Co-authors include numerous NatCappers—Stacie Wolny and Perrine Hamel (based at Stanford University’s Woods Institute for the Environment), P. James Dennedy-Frank (of Stanford University’s Earth Systems Science), Justin Johnson, (based at the University of Minnesota’s Institute on the Environment), as well as local champion Anil Vaidya, of Himachal Pradesh’s Department of Forests and Urvashi Narain of the World Bank, who initiated the project.  

A more detailed account of the project can be found in a 2015 report, put out by Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES).

The project inspired the World Bank’s Urvashi Narain to initiate a similar project with NatCap in Nepal, using similar methods to look at watershed investments for the largest hydropower plant in the country.

“We’re trying to get infrastructure people to understand that their infrastructure sustainability is dependent on ecosystem services,” Vogl said. “It’s about insuring your investment in this infrastructure.”

 

Read the study:Managing forest ecosystem services for hydropower productionVogl, Adrian L., P. James Dennedy-Frank, Stacie Wolny, Justin A. Johnson, Perrine Hamel, Urvashi Narain and  Anil VaidyaEnvironmental Sciences & Policy 61: 221-229. July 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.004

 

More News Topics